Server Team 20100120 meeting minutes

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs here.

Review ACTION points from previous meeting

  • smoser to look at getting Karmic images refreshed: bug verifiedfixed, image refresh coming up before end of week

Action: smoser to publish karmic cloud image refresh

  • mathiaz to send out AWS Client lib RFC: done
  • ttx to coordinate alpha ISO testing: done
  • ttx for papercuts: discuss acceptance criteria, project publicity plan: mail sent, more in this meeting
  • mathiaz to publish papercuts & apport efforts in our blog/community channels: done

  • mathiaz to publish request for iso testing in our regular blog/community channels: done

Spec quickreview

All alpha-3 targeted specs are on track.

To avoid useless noise, blueprint assignees are asked to refresh the status of their specs by using the “Status:” section of the blueprint whiteboard. It will then automagically show up in the report (http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-server-lucid-alpha-3.html).

Action: Everyone: update status for your specs before the meeting starts

Alpha3 subcycle planning

The final planning is still being discussed, and should be officialized this week. No change is expected in the Prio 1 specs (“High” priority), some priority changes might affect Prio2/3 specs, and some late specs might be introduced as Prio2/3 specs.

server-lucid-papercuts

We discussed the papercuts acceptance criteria, as described in a recent ubuntu-server ML post. This looks fine and was approved. Final criteria should make clear that any server-related package (in main, universe or multiverse) is relevant, and that the fix should not introduce a new feature (and therefore be OK to fix after FeatureFreeze). The criteria might be further refined when we start hitting difficult nominations.

About the project publicity plan, mathiaz already posted a blog entry about the project on the ubuntuserver blog. This should be complemented by an ubuntu-devel ML post, personal blog posts (ttx, zul) and brought to the attention of the Ubuntu Weekly News team. alexm will talk about it in his loco. The message is about nominating your favorite server papercuts, so that we gather as many candidates as possible now.

Action: ttx, zul to blog about papercuts, make sure UWN gets the word

Action: ttx to send email about criteria and nomination to ubuntu-devel, ubuntu-server

server-lucid-apport-hooks

Building on the UDS Dallas discussion about how having apport hooks in server packages can help the quality of the bug reports we receive, the server apport hooks effort aims at adding as many as we can before FeatureFreeze. zul created a page at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/ApportHooks with likely candidates. Anyone interested, please sign up for your favorite package, or add your own !

Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team

soren has been extending the ISO testing features, and can now at the click of a button run ISO tests of the cartesian product of i386/amd64,lvm/non-lvm,basic/mail/bind9/lamp/postgresql installs. Documentation on the setup is under way, and the process should be ultimately integrated with Marc Tardif’s checkbox work. soren will lead an UbuntuDeveloperWeek session about this next Tuesday at 2000 UTC.

Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team

Discussion concentrated on bug 494565, since a decision must be reached on the best option to follow. The -virtual kernel currently being a subflavour of -server and -generic-pae, building support for the block devices needed for EC2 and UEC would also affect those kernels. The options are CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_2, CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET and CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK. CONFIG_SCSI_SYM53C8XX_2=y, in particular, could have unexpected consequences on some rare hardware. Note that building in that SCSI support would not prevent it from being manually bypassed. Alternatives would be to make -virtual a flavour of its own (but this adds a lot of maintenance work for the kernel team), patch UEC so that it works without that SCSI support (potential performance issues, deviation from upstream), or abandon the idea of using no ramdisks for UEC. This should be further discussed on ubuntu-devel.

Action: smoser to raise thread about the no-ramdisk / -virtual config tradeoff

Assigned and to-be-assigned bugs

List at http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/team-assigned/canonical-server-assigned-bug-tasks.html still needs to be cleaned up to be more useful.

Action: zul, kirkland to unassign themselves from “maybe working on one day” bugs

Agree on next meeting date and time

Next meeting will be on Wednesday, January 27th at 14:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting.

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: